Sunday, May 22, 2016

Abduction of American Children to Jordan


By
Prof. Gabriel Sawma

In recent years, I have been getting calls from mothers with US citizenships, seeking help in bringing back their children who have been kidnaped by their fathers. In other cases, the mother fears that the father plans to take the children to Jordan and never brings them back to the United States.

In a case that was brought before the Court of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, the client sought my legal advice on case involving a custody order issued by a Shari’a court in Saudi Arabia, in which the father was given right to custody of his two daughters who live with their mother in the State of Pennsylvania. As a result of my testimony, and taking into consideration ‘the best interest of the child’ doctrine, the Court of Allegheny acquired jurisdiction over the custody and ordered that the children stay with their mother in the United States. A copy of the Court judgment is available at request.

Jordan is another country in the Middle East whose laws permit the father to obtain a custody order from the court of that country in the event that he decides to take the child from the United States to Jordan and never return him or her back. This article deals with the law of custody in Jordan in contrast with the law of the United States.

Introduction
The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is situated at the junction of the Levantine and Arabian areas of the Middle East. The country is bordered on the north by Syria, to the east by Iraq, and by Saudi Arabia on the east and south. To the west is Israel and the West Bank.

The country is a constitutional monarch with representative government. The reigning monarch is the head of state, the chief executive authority delegated to the prime minister and the Council of Ministers, or cabinet. The cabinet is responsible before the elected House of Deputies which, along with the House of Notables (i.e. Senate), constitutes the legislative branch of the government. The judicial branch is an independent branch of the government.

Article 2 of the Constitution states that “Islam is the religion of the State and Arabic is its official language.” (See Constitution of The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 1952 at this link: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=227813

Article 99 of the Constitution divides the court into three categories: civilian, religious, and special courts. The civilian courts exercise their jurisdiction in respect to civil and criminal matters in accordance with the law, and they have jurisdiction over all persons in all matters, civil and criminal. The civilian courts include Magistrate Courts, Courts of First Instance, Courts of Appeal, High Administrative Courts and the Court of Cassation (the highest court).

The religious courts include shari’a courts, which apply Islamic law for the Muslim community, and non-Muslim tribunals for other religious communities, namely those of the Christian community living in the country. All religious communities in the kingdom have primary and appellate courts and deal only with matters involving family law such as marriage, divorce, inheritance and custody of the children.

The Shari’a Courts and Application of Islamic law
Article 105 of the Constitution states that “The Sharia Courts shall in accordance with their own laws have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of the following matters: (i) Matters of personal status of Muslims; (ii) Cases concerning blood money (Diya) where the two parties are Muslims or where one of the parties is not a Muslim and the two parties consent to the jurisdiction of the Shari’a Courts; (iii) Matters pertaining to Islamic Waqfs.” (Waqf is an Arabic term used to point to the real estate property owned by the religious communities in Jordan).

Article 106 states that: “The Shari’a Courts shall in the exercise of their jurisdiction apply the provisions of the Shari’a law.” (See unofficial English translation of the Constitution of Jordan at this link: http://www.med-media.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/wcms_125862.pdf

Thus, the Shari’a courts are vested with exclusive jurisdiction in matters related to personal status of the Muslim community such as marriage, divorce, succession, guardianship, inheritance, as well as matters that are related to Muslim religious charitable endowments, and all other matters that are considered Islamic by nature.
The Shari’a courts comprise of courts of First Instance, and courts of appeal. Appeals from the latter is made to the Court of Cassation, which is the highest court of the land. Members of the trial and appeal courts are recruited from the judges who are experts in Islamic law. One judge, called “qadi”, sits in each Shari’a court and decides cases on the basis of Islamic law.

Custody of Children in Jordan
Disputes involving marriage, divorce and custody of children for the Muslim community in Jordan is governed by the Personal Status Law # 36, 2010, published in the Official Gazette, October 10, 2010. The rules applied to the custody of Muslim children are stated in Section 3. Article 173 (1) states that the custody of children belongs to the mother until the child reaches the age of fifteen.  This means the rule governing Muslim children in Jordan is based on the age of the child. After the child reaches the age of fifteen, he or she is given a choice to stay with the mother until the age of maturity, which is 18.

Article 176 states that if the child is a Jordanian citizen, his mother cannot travel with him or her for permanent residency without permission of the wali (guardian).
A mother can lose her primary right to custody of the child if the Shari’a court determines that she is incapable of safeguarding the child or of bringing the child up in accordance with the appropriate religious Islamic standards.

According to Article 172(b), the wife loses her right to custody when the child reaches the age of seven if the mother is not Muslim. In other words, the age fifteen stated in article 173(1) for custody assumes that the mother belongs to the Islamic faith. If, however, the wife is not Muslim, then her custody ends when the child reaches the age of 7. This clause is based on Islamic Shari’a; it does not take into account the best interest of the child.

Jordan Does Not Recognize U.S. Custody Orders
The general rule is that Islamic Shari’a does not recognize a civil marriage, civil divorce or custody order issued by a US court. Under the Jordanian Personal Status Law, which is based on Islamic law for the Muslim community, the Shari’a courts will not recognize US judgments of custody. A US custody order issued at the request of an American mother will not be enforceable in Jordan. 

Abduction of children is a major offense in Jordan. An American mother may face serious legal difficulties if she attempts to take her children out of Jordan without written permission of the father.

If a Jordanian father chooses to take the children to Jordan and leave them there, the U.S. Embassy cannot force the father or the Jordanian government to return the child to the United States, nor is it possible in most cases to extradite a Jordanian father to the United States for parental child abduction. American citizens planning a trip to Jordan with dual national children should bear this in mind.

Jordan Entered Islamic Reservations to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)
Upon ratification of the CRC, Jordan entered reservation to the Convention stating: “The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan expresses its reservation and does not consider itself bound by articles 14, 20 and 21 of the Convention, which grant the child the right to freedom of choice of religion and concern the question of adoption, since they are at variance with the precepts of the tolerant Islamic Shari’ah.” So what do articles 14, 20 and 21 cover?
Article 14 reads: (1) State Parties shall respect the right of the child to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. (2) States Parties shall respect the rights and duties of the parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to provide direction to the child in the exercise of his or her right in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child. (3) Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.”

According to article 14, children have the right to think and believe what they want and to practice their religion, as long as they are not stopping other people from enjoying their rights. Parent should guide their children in these matters. The Convention respects the rights and duties of parents in providing religious and moral guidance to their children. Religious groups around the world have expressed support for the Convention, which indicates that it in no way prevents parents from bringing their children up within a religious tradition. At the same time, the Convention recognizes that as children mature and are able to form their own views, some may question certain religious practices or cultural traditions. The Convention supports children’s right to examine their beliefs, but it also states that their right to express their beliefs implies respect for the rights and freedoms of others.

Jordan entered reservation to article 20 of the Convention which states that children who cannot be looked after by their own family have a right to special care and must be looked after properly, by people who respect their ethnic group, religion, culture and language. This provision seems to be in violation of Islamic Shari’a which regards children born of Muslim fathers are considered to be Muslims and have to be raised by Muslim families.

Jordan entered reservation to Article 21 which talks about adoption of children. According to article 21, children have the right to care and protection if they are adopted or in foster care. The first concern must be what is best for them. The same rules should apply whether they are adopted in the country where they were born, or if they are taken to live in another country.

When Jordan entered Islamic reservations to the CRC and specified what provision the Kingdom is reserving to, the reservations do not indicate a refusal to be bound by the most central provisions of the Convention. That is, Jordan is not indicating a rejection of the overall goal of improving the wellbeing of children. Jordan singled out adoption and freedom of religion as indicated above, both of which violate percepts of Islamic law as traditionally interpreted.

DISCLAIMER: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

Gabriel Sawma is a lawyer with Middle East background, and a recognized authority on Islamic law, mainly the law of marriage, divorce and custody of children, Hindu marital disputes in U.S. courts, and Iran divorce in USA.
·        Professor of Middle East Constitutional and Islamic law,
·        Expert Consultant on Islamic divorce in US Courts and Canada,
·        Expert Consultant on Hindu divorce in U.S. courts,
·        Expert Consultant on Iranian Shi’a divorce in USA,
·        Expert Consultant on Islamic finance.
Admitted to the Lebanese Bar Association; Associate Member of the New York State Bar Association and the American Bar Association.
Prof. Sawma lectured at the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) in New York State and wrote many affidavits to immigration authorities, Federal Courts, and family State Courts in connection with recognition of Islamic foreign divorces in the U.S., Hindu divorces, and Iranian marital conflicts.
Taught Islamic Finance for MBA program at the University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Travelled extensively to: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Egypt, Sudan, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Syria and Palestine.
Wrote many articles on Islamic and Hindu divorce in USA, custody of children in the Middle East and Central Asia; and on abduction of children to Muslim countries; 
Speaks, reads and writes several languages including Arabic, English, French and others.
Interviewed by:

Contact Information:


Tel. (609) 915-2237
For more information on our field of expertise, please visit our websites at the following links, where you will find most of our articles:

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Curriculum Vitae - Gabriel Sawma

·        Professor: Middle East Studies at Fairleigh Dickinson University.
·        Lawyer with Middle East Background; Graduated in 1970 from the Lebanese University, school of law.
·        Admitted to the Lebanese Bar Association of Beirut.
·        Practiced law in Beirut at the law firm of Rizkallah & Farah.
·        Nominated to be a judge in Lebanon, Lebanese Judicial Studies..
·        Supervised contracts in Europe and the Middle East.

·        Travelled extensively to the Middle East, including Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates.
·        Worked in Saudi Arabia.

·        Expert consultant on Islamic law.

·        Expert consultant on Islamic divorce in USA.

·        Expert consultant on mahr agreements in Islamic marriage contracts.

·        Expert consultant on Islamic finance.



Professor at Fairleigh Dickinson University
285 Madison Avenue,
Madison, NJ 07940-1099.

Taught the following courses:
·        Arabic 1001, Fall 2007, Spring 2008
·        Arabic 1002, Spring 2008
·        Arab Culture and Civilization, Fall 2009
·        Arab-Islamic Culture and Civilization, Fall 2011
·        Near East as Source of Western Culture
·        Middle East Constitutional Law – comparative study, including Islamic law of marriage, divorce, child custody and inheritance

Lecturer on Islamic Finance at the University of Liverpool:

Course taught at Mercer Community College, West Windsor, New Jersey, Fall 2011.
·        Arabic 101


Professor of Arabic 101 at Princeton Adult School in Princeton, NJ (2010, 2011, 2012, 2013)


Lecturer on Islamic Shari’a and its sources. See my lecture at Fairleigh Dickinson University to students and faculty:


Expert Consultant on Muslim family laws of the Middle East, Central and southeast Asia, Africa, and India.


Expert Consultant of Islamic divorce in USA, see our website at:
http://www.islamicdivorceinusa.com

Lectured in New York at The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.


Featured on the BBC as, “Expert Consultant on Islamic divorce in USA.” The interview is posted on BBC’s website:


Featured on CNN as “Professor and Expert Consultant on Islamic sharia law.” The interview is posted on CNN’s website:


Editor in chief of a blog on International Law, mainly Islamic law of marriage, divorce and custody of children:



Won A Landmark Case In New York Involving Recognition of a Foreign Divorce Judgment including custody, and securing a mahr of $250,000 for the client
In 2012, the Supreme Court of Westchester County handed down a decision in favor of my client. The court recognized a divorce decree obtained from Abu Dhabi (UAE), including custody of children and recognizing a mahr agreement of $250,000. The entire court order is available on this link: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2012/2012-ny-slip-op-51875-u.html

The Appellate Division Affirms

On January 20, 2015, the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, issued a ruling, in which the Court affirmed the decision of the lower Court. The decision of the Appellate Division is available on this link: http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/ad2/calendar/webcal/decisions/2016/D47647.pdf


Won A Landmark Case Involving Custody of Children
Saudi Arabia’s Shari’a Court issued a custody order against a U.S. citizen woman who was married to a Saudi husband. The husband obtained a court judgment from Saudi Arabia granting him custody of his two daughters. The Court in Allegheny, Pennsylvanian agreed with our argument that Saudi Arabia does not have jurisdiction, and the custody order violates Pennsylvania public policy and that Saydi Arabia is in violation to international human rights treaties.

The court order is not published yet, but I have a copy at request. Once published, I will post the link online. For more information on Abduction of children or fear of abduction to Muslim majority countries, please see our website at: www.gabrielsawma.blogspot.com

Author of dozens of articles dealing with Islamic divorce in USA and on International Law: Most of these articles can be found on our website at, http://www.gabrielsawma.blogspot.com

Following is a partial list of my articles on Islamic and Hindu Divorces:

·        Iraqi Divorce in U.S. Courts
·        Yemeni Divorce and U.S. Immigration
·        Egyptian Divorce and U.S. Immigration
·        Palestinian Islamic Divorce of West Bank in USA
·        Saudi Divorce in USA
·        Saudi Divorce and U.S. Immigration
·        Saudi Arabian Child Custody Cases in USA
·        Pakistani Divorce and U.S. Immigration
·        Muslim Divorce in Tunisia
·        Muslim Divorce in Bangladesh
·        Marriage of Minors in Islam
·        The Iddat of a Woman in Islam
·        Muslim Men Marrying Non-Muslim Women
·        The Law of Marriage and Divorce in the United Arab Emirates
·        Islamic Syrian Divorce in USA
·        Islamic Yemeni Divorce in USA
·        Islamic Jordanian Divorce in USA
·        Recognition of Hindu Divorces in New York State
·        Islamic Divorce in New York State
·        The Khul’ Divorce in Egypt
·        Islamic Women Divorce Laws in Egypt
·        Muslim Iranian Divorce in USA
·        Pakistani Islamic Divorce in U.S. Courts
·        Islamic Lebanese Divorce in USA
·        Islamic Marriage Over the Phone, an interview with BBC, (see above)
·        Islamic Sharia in Theory and Practice, a Lecture at FDU, (see above)
·        Divorce in Egypt, an interview with CNN, (see above)
·        Annulment of Islamic Marriages
·        The Wali (guardian) in Islamic Marriages According to Hanafi Jurisprudence
·        Islamic Marriage Contracts in the Hanafi Jurisprudence
·        The Jihaz in Islamic Marriages
·        The Nafaqa in Islamic Marriage
·        The Mahr in Islamic Marriage Contracts
·        Indian Divorce in US Courts
·        Application of Islamic Sharia in US Courts
·        Abduction of children to Muslim Majority Countries
·        Abduction of children from USA to Saudi Arabia


Partial List of my Articles on International Law:[2]
·        Do Sanctions on Iran Work?
·        The Shebaa Farms Under International Law
·        The Scope and Nature of Immunity from Jurisdiction for Heads of State Under International Law
·        The Nigerian Scam and its Impact on Global Economy
·        Public International Law and Organizations
·        Limitations on the Effectiveness of Trademark Laws in the EU


LANGUAGES
Speak, read and write: Arabic, English, French, Syriac, Biblical and Talmudic Aramaic


BAR ASSOCIATIONS
1.     Admitted to the Lebanese Bar Association of Beirut since 1970
2.     Former Associate Member of the New York Bar Association, 1982
3.     Former Associate Member of the American Bar Association, 2003




CONTACT INFORMATION:


Cell (609) 915-2237





Wrote extensively on International law in the area of the European Union Law. Following are excerpts:
§  Limitations on the Effectiveness of Trademark Laws in the European Union, Case Study, http://gabrielsawma.blogspot.com/2005/04/limitations-on-effectiveness-of.html
§  Islamic divorce in U.S. courts, http://www.phillyimc.org/en/islamic-divorce-us-courts
§  Prohibition of interest in Islamic banking and finance, http://searchwarp.com/swa615826-Prohibition-Of-Interest-In-Islamic-Banking-And-Finance.htm
§  the Scope of Immunity for Heads of States under International Law, http://searchwarp.com/swa65501.htm
§  The mahr provision in Islamic marriage contract, http://searchwarp.com/swa521011-The-Mahr-Provision-In-Islamic-Marriage-Contracts.htm
§  Application of Islamic shari’a in U.S. courts, http://gabrielsawma.blogspot.com/2008/06/application-of-islamic-sharia-in-us.html
§  Muslim brotherhood and the Middle East Upheaval, http://miami.indymedia.org/news/2011/04/22114.php






[2] These articles can be accessed on http://www.gabrielsawma.blogspot.com

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

ABDUCTION OF AMERICAN CHILDREN TO SAUDI ARABIA


By
Prof. Gabriel Sawma

As this article was being written, the court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Family Division, issued a judgment in our favor, granting the custody of two children to the mother and denying a request by the father to take the children back to Saudi Arabia. This custody order complies with out argument before the court of Pennsylvania that the Saudi custody order should not be recognized for violation of US and international law, and it should not be recognized for violation of Pennsylvania public policy, and because Saudi Arabia is not a signatory to The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. The court order is not published yet; I will post the link once it is published. A copy is available at the request of judges and lawyers.

In recent years, I have been getting calls from clients throughout the U.S. and Canada seeking help in bringing back their children who were kidnapped from the United States to Saudi Arabia by their fathers. Most of these cases involve a marriage of Saudi men to women of U.S. nationality. This situation becomes a frustrating task for judges and lawyers for not being able to have the government of Saudi Arabia comply with U.S. court decisions to bring back the children, or grant visa to the mother to travel to Saudi Arabia and see her children. That is because Saudi Arabia does not recognize US court orders.

In other situations, the children live in the United States with their mother, but fear that the husband can obtain Saudi passport for the children and plans to take them to Saudi Arabia with the purpose of staying there and not allowing them to come back to the United States.

This article addresses the legal issues facing women who see their children abducted to Saudi Arabia by their fathers for the sole purpose of keeping them in that country and not allowing them to return to USA. Some of the calls I receive indicate “fear of abduction” by the husband. The article also helps American women to understand the ramifications, in connection with custody of their children, when they marry Saudi men.

On its website, the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, capital of Saudi Arabia, states the following: “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not a party to The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, nor are there any international or bilateral treaties in force between Saudi Arabia and the United States dealing with international parental child abduction. American citizens who travel to Saudi Arabia are subject to the jurisdiction of Saudi courts, as well as to the country’s laws and regulations. This hold true for all legal matters including child custody. Parents planning to travel with their children to Saudi Arabia should bear this in mind.” (See Embassy of the United States in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia at: http://riyadh.usembassy.gov/ipca2.html

Introduction
Saudi Arabia is a kingdom located in the Middle East between the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea. It borders Jordan, Iraq, and Kuwait to the north, Yemen to the south, and Oman, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Qatar to the east.

Unlike most Muslim majority countries of the Middle East, where personal status laws have been codified for the various religious communities, Saudi Arabia does not have a codified family law. The religion of Saudi Arabia is Islam and its constitution is the “Book of God Most High and the Sunna of His Prophet.” This means the rule of Saudi Arabia draws its authority from the Quran and the sayings and deeds of the Prophet of Islam. Consequently, Sharia courts apply, in cases brought before them, the rules according to the Quran, the Sunna and the interpretations of these two divine elements given by major scholars in the Hanbali School of Thought, which is the dominant school of jurisprudence in the kingdom.

Without going into details about the Schools of Thought in Sunni and Shi’i Islam, it is worth to note here that Islamic Sharia is explained within the context of Four Schools of jurisprudence in Sunni Islam and three Schools within the Shi’a community. These are known in Arabic as Madhaahib, singular Madhab. In other words, each Muslim majority county applies the rules of Islamic Sharia according to one or more of these Schools. Saudi Arabia, for example applies the rules of Hanbali jurisprudence, while Lebanon and Syria apply the rules according to Hanafi School of Thought for the Sunnis. In Indonesia, they apply the rules of Shafi’i. (For more information on the distribution of Schools of Thought in the Islamic world, see: http://veil.unc.edu/religions/islam/law/


Custody Orders Are Determined by Religion, Gender, and Age of the Child
Custody orders issued by Saudi Shari’a courts are based on religion, gender of the child, and his or her age. The most important criteria in Saudi custody orders is that the custodian father will take care of the children by bringing them up within the Islamic faith. This means that the religion of the father determines the custody of his children; a child born of a Muslim father, his or her custody goes directly to the father without taking into consideration the Western notion of the ‘best interest of the child.’
In the event of divorce, custody of girls and boys belong to the father when they reach age of seven. Girls are not given a choice to live with the mother or father, but boys are usually give that choice.

Saudi courts generally do not award custody of children to non-Saudi women. If the mother is not Arab Muslim, judges will not grant her custody of the children.
Saudi custody orders do not take into consideration the best interest of the child. Shari’a court judges do not interview the children and do not provide the opportunity for the children to make their views known.

In Saudi Arabia, the mother’s role in reproduction is, in fact, limited to childbirth, nursing, and the nurturing of young children. Beyond that stage, custody of children belongs to the father.

Under Saudi law, no woman or child can leave the country unless the ‘guardian’ approves of that. The ‘guardian’ is the husband, who has authority to deny his wife or children, whether adult or not from traveling outside the country without his permission, even if they hold U.S. citizenship.

In most cases, Saudi fathers have married their half-American daughters to other Saudi men. The U.S. Embassy can intercede with the Saudi government to request exit visas for adult U.S. women, but there is no guarantee that the visas will be issued, and obtaining an exit visa without the male guardian’s consent takes many months, if it can be obtained at all. The U.S. Embassy cannot obtain exit visas for the departure of minor children without their father’s permission.

In September 2002, the Foreign Minister of Saudi Arabia announced that any adult American woman who wishes to leave Saudi Arabia, can do so even without permission of her male guardian. The Foreign Minister did not say anything about half-American children.

Saudi Arabia does not recognize dual citizenship. The U.S. Embassy in Riyadh states that: “The Saudi government does not recognize dual nationality. Saudi authorities have confiscated the U.S. passports of U.S. citizens and U.S.-Saudi dual nationals when they have applied for Saudi citizenship or a Saudi passport.” <http://riyadh.usembassy.gov/service/passport-and-citizenship/dual-nationality.html>

In its 2016 report on Saudi Arabia, Amnesty International states the following: “Women and girls remained subject to discrimination in law and in practice. Women has subordinate status to men under the law, particularly in relation to family matters such as marriage, divorce, child custody and inheritance, and they were inadequately protected against sexual and other violence. Domestic violence remained endemic, despite a government awareness-raising campaign launched in 2013. A law criminalizing domestic violence which was adopted in 2013 remained unimplemented in practice.” (See <https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/saudi-arabia/report-saudi-arabia/ >

In Saudi Arabia, women are prohibited from obtaining passport, marrying, traveling, or accessing higher education without the approval of a male guardian.; A father may force his female children into marriage without their consent, and underage girls may be forced to marry.

Under the Islamic rules, a Muslim man may marry up to four wives at one time, and according to the Qur’an, women should be devoutly obedient to their husbands and “men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has made one of them to excel the other.” (Qur’an 4:34)

One such manifestation of obedience is wearing the hijab, which means face and head covering and all over the body, and men can end the marriage by simply stating ‘I divorce you’. The husband can divorce his wife without having to obtain a judicial order, and without having to give very much justification. On the other hand, a woman must get a judicial decree in order to get out of the marriage.

Under Islamic law, a woman’s testimony in court is equivalent to half that of a man, and a Muslim woman is prohibited from marrying non-Muslim man.


Saudi Arabia Does Not Have Equal Protection of the Law
The most influential formulation of the principle of equal protection of the law was set forth in the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution is not recognized in Saudi Arabia. The Kingdom discriminates against women, whose status is more difficult than in any other country in the world, particularly with regard of freedom of movement (forbidden from driving), and may not travel without being accompanied by a male relative, freedom of speech, and freedom from dress restrictions.


Saudi Arabia Is Not Party to The Hague Convention On the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Saudi Arabia is not party to The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, nor are there any international or bilateral treaties in force between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United States dealing with international parental child abduction, nor to an extradition treaty with the U.S.


Saudi Arabia Does Not Recognize U.S. Custody Orders
Saudi Arabia does not recognize U.S. court orders, including custody of children and divorce decrees, which are consequently unenforceable in Saudi Arabia.


Saudi Arabia Did Not Sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and Entered Reservations on Other International Human Rights Treaties
UDHR was adopted on December 10, 1948 by the United Nations General Assembly. Saudi Arabia never signed the Declaration, and ratified The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) by entering reservations that make Islamic Shari’a superior to the Convention, which was adopted in 1979 by the UN General Assembly.

Saudi Arabia did not ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which was adopted on December 19, 1966 by the General Assembly of the United Nations. Saudi Arabia is one of the few states that is not a party to ICCPR. Human Rights Watch confirms this fact in its report, which reads: “Despite its assertions to the contrary, Saudi Arabia, by virtue of its membership in the United Nations, is committed to uphold universal human rights standards, including those set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which are recognized as norms of customary international law. Other international instruments elaborate upon these rights, most notably the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which 138 states are party. Although Saudi Arabia is one of the few nations that is not a party, the terms of ICCPR provide guidance as to the content of the fundamental rights that Saudi Arabia is obliged to respect, based on Saudi’s participation in the United Nations and the universally binding character of such rights.” (See the Report on this link: <https://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/saudi/Saudi-07.htm


Saudi Arabia Violates Treaty on Human Rights for The Child
In November 1989, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a human rights treaty called The Convention of the Child (CRC), or (UNCRC). It sets out the civil, political, economic, social, health and cultural rights of the children. It defines a child as any human being under the age of eighteen, unless the age of majority is attained earlier under a state’s own domestic legislation. The treaty came into force on September 2, 1990, after it was ratified by the required number of nations.

Saudi Arabia ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1996, but it entered a reservation “With respect to all such articles as are in conflict with the provisions of Islamic law.” This means, Saudi law enforcement officials, judges, and prosecutors “have very broad discretion to determine issues such as when to arrest children, how long to detain them and what punishments to impose on those deemed to have broken the law.” (See Adults Before Their Time: Children in Saudi Arabia’s Criminal Justice System, volume 20, by Human Rights Watch, 2008, p.8.) This also means that Saudi Arabia considers Islamic Shari’a superior to international human rights laws.

There is no minimum age of marriage in Saudi Arabia, a number of notorious child marriage cases have reported by the media, such as when an eight-year-old girl requested the courts in May 2009 to grant her divorce from her fifty-year-old husband. (See A Conspicuous Silence: American Foreign Policy, Women, and Saudi Arabia by Valerie Hudson, Columbia University Press, 2015, electronic version)


DISCLAIMER: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it is not intended to provide legal advice as individual situations will differ and should be discussed with an expert and/or lawyer. For specific or legal advice on the information provided and related topics, please contact the author.

Gabriel Sawma is a lawyer with Middle East background, and a recognized authority on Islamic law, mainly the law of marriage, divorce and custody of children, Hindu marital disputes in U.S. courts, and Iran divorce in USA.
·        Professor of Middle East Constitutional and Islamic law,
·        Expert Consultant on Islamic divorce in US Courts and Canada,
·        Expert Consultant on Hindu divorce in U.S. courts,
·        Expert Consultant on Iranian Shi’a divorce in USA,
·        Expert Consultant on Islamic finance.
Admitted to the Lebanese Bar Association; Associate Member of the New York State Bar Association and the American Bar Association.
Prof. Sawma lectured at the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML) in New York State and wrote many affidavits to immigration authorities, Federal Courts, and family State Courts in connection with recognition of Islamic foreign divorces in the U.S., Hindu divorces, and Iranian marital conflicts.
Taught Islamic Finance for MBA program at the University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Travelled extensively to: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Egypt, Sudan, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Syria and Palestine.
Wrote many articles on Islamic and Hindu divorce in USA, custody of children in the Middle East and Central Asia; and on abduction of children to Muslim countries; 
Speaks, reads and writes several languages including Arabic, English, French and others.
Interviewed by:

Contact Information:


Tel. (609) 915-2237
For more information on our field of expertise, please visit our websites at the following links, where you will find most of our articles: